|
Post by Larry Heider on Jun 4, 2009 12:31:15 GMT -5
Dark December by Robert E. Merriam
After reading a posting by MB member dianekrollewis about "St. Vith: Lion in the Way", I was intrigued by a book she mentioned titled "Dark December" by Robert E. Merriam. After a little web surfing I was able to find a very nicely cared for edition at abebooks.com. The book arrived yesterday and I am only 40 pages into it but I must say that this is an extremely well written and researched rendering of the who, what, when and where's of the Battle of the Bulge. Mr. Merriam was an official US Army Historian who was attached to the 9th Armored Division. On Dec. 16,1944 he was visiting with an Intelligence Officer in the 7th Armored Division, thus placing him at the very tip of the German thrust and the same location as the 106th's positions. His style of writing is not a dry rendition of the facts, he delivers information in a very readable and understandable manner. I'm am sure this will be a good read and a important source for future writers and historians.
|
|
|
Post by connie on Jun 6, 2009 9:26:07 GMT -5
Larry,
I'm glad that you and Diane brought this one up. The book with a 1947 copyright is here beside me thanks to my older brother who handed this (and A Time For Trumpets) to me last year --- both from Dad's collection. Dark December was on our family's bookshelves all my life, and I never picked it up or knew what it was. My brother knew. And, he said Dad had read it many times. I'm in the middle of at least 3 books right now. So, I haven't read this one yet and will be interested in what you have to say when you finish it. But, I can attest to the fact that this was available early on and read by probably more than one man from the 106th as he tried to piece together the larger picture of the war he had experienced.
|
|
Carl W.
Active Member
Administrator
The Golden Lions
Posts: 265
|
Post by Carl W. on Jun 6, 2009 14:12:24 GMT -5
Dark December is indeed a well written book and provides a very complete look on the Ardennes campaign, although written very shortly after the war. As with everything, new facts pop up after many years and theories are reviewed. But in all, this book is a must read for anyone interested in the BoB and grants a full picture as it is written when all was still 'fresh' in the minds of the participants.
|
|
|
Post by gfgrant8443 on Jun 7, 2009 22:21:25 GMT -5
You all have talked me into it. I found a used copy on Amazon.com for $10.00 and looking forward to reading it as soon as it arrives.
Frank Grant
|
|
|
Post by gfgrant8443 on Jun 9, 2009 22:17:09 GMT -5
I received my copy of Dark December and did a quick first reading. It is absolutely a well written and well researched book with a lot of interviews with American and German general officers that were major players during the Battle of the Bulge. The only disappointment was that there was only about a page and a half dedicated to the 106th Division. I still think it was worthwhile to read since it gave you an overall view of the roles played by all the units on both sides and it will make a valuable addition to my book collection. Since this book was written in the late 1940's it still offered the wrongheaded opinion that the 422nd and the 423rd should have held out longer (even though they were out of food, water and ammunition and no hope of getting more). I'm glad that more recently this opinion has changed.
Frank Grant
|
|
|
Post by Larry Heider on Jun 14, 2009 18:30:52 GMT -5
I have just finished reading Dark December and it was as well written and informative as I had hoped. While I am more interested in the on the ground personal experiences of the soldiers, this book did make the bigger picture more understandable. It describes the timeline of events of both the American and German armies in logistical perspective without getting caught up in the fine details. It also highlights the problems that both armies had in capturing the momentum that would lead to victory. In terms of the 106th, I feel that the author described the untenable position of the Division quite fairly and emphasized the confusion and conflicting rumors in the higher echelon that led to rupture of the Schnee Eifel by the Germans. His emphasis on the battle for St. Vith being the most important event, instead of the battle for Bastogne, is something that most historians overlook and that alone makes the book an important addition to a BoB library.
|
|
|
Post by floydragsdale on Jun 14, 2009 20:17:37 GMT -5
Hello:
I'm glad that you mentioned Bastogne "getting all the publicity and attention." One thing that made the town "famous" was the Reply "nuts" to surrendering. The news media (press) really played that one to the hilt.
I became acquainted with several 101st Airborn Infantrymen sometime in January 1945. Both of them "laughed" at all the publicity their Division received about the battle for that town.
They went on to say that "many of the 101st members were on pass, or furlough to Paris and London when the bulge began." They also claimed that many stragglers, into Bastogne, from other outfits played a large part in defending that town.
I've always felt that the 106th Division took alot of criticism for its' part in the B.O.B.; yet, the Division took the brunt of the German Offensive. It was like a proffessional carpenter hitting the nail square on the head every time he swung the hammer! The 106th Division took many of those blows and, being spread out for 27miles and out numbered ten to one, it was fortunate that one Regiment (424th) survived to continue the fighting.
From one who was there,
Floyd 2nd Btn., 424th Regiment
|
|
|
Post by connie on Feb 1, 2011 10:58:17 GMT -5
I like the fact that conversations go on here while the print in a book remains fixed and stagnant. Frank mentioned that he saw some flaws in this early, well-written book. He referred to the "wrong headded" attitudes about the fall of some units. These attitudes were there early on but changed as more facts came to light. Sadly, as something enters print it is preserved for reference.
This AM I was reading a section on 422 Unit History in the Division Association's The Cub of the Golden Lion Passes in Review (out of print; still available occasionally. Since this book is a compilation of many things from earlier Cub Magazines, I am thinking that the content I was reading may be available on the Indiana Military site. I'll try to check this out later. Right now that site appears to be down.
Anyway, in Unit Histories under Company H 422, by Lewis R Walker 2nd Lt. it says, "The author explains that one of his main purposes in writing the history of his company is to refute the aspersions cast on the 422 in Robert Merriam's "Dark December."
I'm hoping that the "June July 1948 notation under the author's name indicated the issue of the Cub in which this history appears. And I am hoping that the Indiana Military Site includes this edition. This would be a good reference for anyone wishing to see more of the picture.
Connie
|
|
|
Post by connie on Apr 2, 2013 12:59:29 GMT -5
The other day I was in a used book store with a limited amount of time for looking, I headed for the WWII books and grabbed a paperback with a 1947 copyright with the not too creative title: The Battle of the Bulge. It turned out to be by Robert Merriam and was an abridged version of Dark December. Today I was doing some research and again hit the 422nd Unit History in The Cub of the Golden Lion Passes in review and again read (as if for the first time) Lewis Walker's account of Company H 422 with his mission to refute aspersions cast on the 422nd by Merriam in Dark December. I am glad both accounts exist. Merriam did a good job early on of covering the tremendously complex big picture. I now need to read both accounts carefully and see where Merram missed out on 422nd details. It's a good cautionary tale. And a good reason for discussion boards such as this to exist. December 19, 2020 Added Note from Connie Here's a link to notes on The Cub of the Golden Lion Passes in Review, which includes links to the text on the Indiana Military site: 106thdivision.proboards.com/post/4785/thread
|
|
|
Post by floydragsdale on Apr 3, 2013 19:46:58 GMT -5
Hello Connie:
Here is my two cents worth about the B.O.B..
Rifle Companies were allowed just 48 rounds per man. Ammunition was rationed. The Schnee Eifle area was a ghost front. Nothing major had happened there for over six weeks. Ammunition supplies went to areas where the war was more active.
G Company men were instructed to shoot at the Germans once in a while just to let them know that we were present. It was so quiet that our Company Commander ordered an inspection at 0600 hours on the morning of 12/16/44. We were ordered to be fresh shaved by that time and have our weapons “spotless clean”. Our C.O. was cheated out of his inspection by ten minutes. We were all spruced up for something else. At 05:50 A.M. the Battle of the Bulge began. At that precise moment all hell broke loose up and down the front.
When I was there (Belgium) in Sep 2010, I saw first hand the 2,000 yard gap that existed between the 424th Regiment & 423rd Regiment.
On the evening of the 2nd day of the B.O.B. I stood in a foxhole and witnessed a German Armored Column advance straight at me, then abruptly, less that 100 yard from my position, make a turn to their right and proceed right through that Gap. At that precise moment the 423rd Regiment was being surrounded.
Some of our foxholes were as much as fifty yards apart. The width of the entire battle area was eighty miles. Four-hundred-thousand German Soldiers were pitted against eighty-thousand American troops. Because of very foggy, misty, weather there was no Air support for German or American Soldiers. The Army Table of Organization called for an Infantry Division to cover five miles of front line. The 106th Division was spread out for twenty-seven miles. The other four American divisions covering that region were scattered over the terrain the same number of miles, or further than the 106th Division was.
Yes, some American Soldiers fled in face of the German onslaught, however they were Division and Regimental Headquarters personnel. Their posts were being over-run by the blitz krieg (lightning war) of the fast moving German Army. Front line troops did the fighting. Headquarters people were armed with typewriters, radios, paper clips and rubber bands and not weapons with bullets in them.
The German Army disrupted American supply lines to the point were it was difficult, for supply people, to provide rations to troops on the front lines. By the way, at this point in the Battle of the Bulge, the front lines were whatever direction an American Soldier faced. Some soldiers endured two and three days at a time without rations. Between skirmishes, with the enemy, he ate whatever he could get his hands on; too often that was little, or nothing.
German Soldiers swarmed all over our positions. They behaved as though they didn’t care if they lived, or died.
It was during that campaign that many of us learned what it was like to hike so many miles (fifty) that we went to sleep while walking, stand in a foxhole for hours at a time in twenty-five degree below zero temperatures and endure two or three days at a time without nourishment. To quench our thirst occasionally snow, when it was available, became a substitute for fresh water.
I learned from a high ranking officer that the Army estimated they had a Division on the front lines, a Division going to the hospital, a Division in the Hospital, a Division coming back from the hospital and a Division in the grave. Other statistics that I learned, from informed sources, were that the Army was losing fifteenhundred men a day up front.
A front line Soldiers fantasy was go get a million dollar wound (not life threading) so he could be hospitalized for a while. Then he would have a warm bed and something to eat everyday.
Sometimes dying seemed to be more acceptable than living in the miserable circumstances that troops were existing in.
To supply the troops of the 422nd and 423rd Regiments would require an airdrop of food and ammunition. Weather conditions totally prohibited those plans.
The Officers who surrendered those two Regiments did a very compassionate thing for their Soldiers. To do otherwise would have been wholesale slaughter for the men of those Regiments. Soldiers don’t fight armored vehicles with snowballs and live to tell about it. As an alternative they went to German P.O.W. Camps for the remainder of the War. At least the majority of those Soldiers lived to tell about their experience.
Generals and their associate officers place Army Divisions where they believe they are critically needed. The German Generals assembled an Army of four-hundred-thousand men, in absolute silence (no radio communication) and got away with it. Only they knew that they were there. Our General Staff was hoodwinked by those tactics. The results seduced Adolph Hitler into launching the largest battle, The Battle of the Bulge, ever fought and won by the American Army. The calculated risk was a gamble by American Generals nevertheless, it hastened the end of the war. The final results were that Hitler lost everything; including his life.
Volumes of books have been written about that battle and in the course of time more will probably be written regarding that affair.
Multitudes of Soldiers who took part in that campaign have left the stage of life. Still there are a few left to describe it like they witnessed it. I feel blessed to be one of those who were there and vividly remember that conflict and communicate those reminiscences to this website.
Floyd
|
|
|
Post by connie on Dec 19, 2020 18:37:34 GMT -5
It was great to read the discussions above, along with Floyd Ragsdale's observations on the war. I'm updating access info on the book Dark December by Robert Merriam numerous paperback designs appear to exist; my original hardcover was a black book Amazon Link www.amazon.com/Dark-December-Account-Battle-Bulge/dp/159416150X. includes hardcover, paperback, and kindle editions Here's the review on Amazon “Dark December occupies a distinguished place among war books. Every paragraph is based upon evidence, not flimsy wartime rumors. Technical enough for the professional, accurate enough for the historian (in fact, it is history of the best), it is lucid and understandable for the general reader.”—New York Herald Tribune “If other veterans of the Army’s historical division can maintain Mr. Merriam’s high standard of stimulating, critical and painstaking work, we will be fortunate. Dark December can be heartily recommended to anyone faintly interested in the war.”—New York Times “The book explodes a number of myths which have been winning their improper way into general belief.” —Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., Booklist The massive German counteroffensive through Belgium’s Ardennes forest in December 1944 took the American and British armies by surprise and changed the outcome of the war. With whole divisions destroyed and decimated, the American army scrambled to contain the German threat, while also trying to determine how such an attack had gone undetected. The Americans succeeded in winning the month-long battle, commonly known as the Battle of the Bulge, through the tenacity of several pockets of troops, notably those in the Belgian town of Bastogne, and the remarkable rapid movement of Patton’s Third Army to seal the breech in the American lines. The battle stalled the British and American advances and lengthened the war with the result that the Soviet Union was able to make greater gains in Europe than previously anticipated. Dark December is a thorough and engrossing examination of the Battle of the Bulge by a historian who had the opportunity to prepare notes as the battle was occurring and consult classified American as well as German records. Notably, the book contains unique and critical information, including details gleaned from interviews conducted by the author with commanding officers on both sides, some of which are the only reports gathered from these sources. Originally published in 1947, this the first paperback edition with the complete original text and maps.
|
|